Usage Score
31.3
Player Dossier
2021-2025Arkansas
RB • 6'2" • 223 lbs • Utica, NY, USA
Michael Washington leans workhorse runner traits and 65.6 efficiency.
Usage Score
31.3
Efficiency
65.6
Consistency
78.7
Season Value
68.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Arkansas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Washington, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Arkansas. Michael Washington leans workhorse runner traits and 65.6 efficiency.
Michael Washington played RB for Buffalo, New Mexico State, and Arkansas. Across 5 tracked seasons, Michael Washington recorded 2,881 rushing yards, 412 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Arkansas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 1,294 primary output with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Buffalo, New Mexico State, Arkansas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with 163 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
107.8
Efficiency
65.6
Usage
31.3
Consistency
78.7
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 105. Arkansas State: 116. Ole Miss: 118. Memphis: 84. Notre Dame: 69. Tennessee: 137. Texas A&M: 163. Auburn: 52. Mississippi State: 135. LSU: 91. Texas: 148. Missouri: 76
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 11 by 89.8. Arkansas State: 9 by 100. Ole Miss: 15 by 64. Memphis: 17 by 49.8. Notre Dame: 16 by 44.2. Tennessee: 20 by 71.6. Texas A&M: 19 by 85.7. Auburn: 13 by 38. Mississippi State: 23 by 62.6. LSU: 14 by 67.9. Texas: 23 by 65.4. Missouri: 16 by 48.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Missouri | L 17-31 | 11 | 50 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 | 26 | 4.8 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Texas100 rush yards | L 37-52 | 17 | 105 | 6.20 | 1 | 6 | 43 | 6.4 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ LSU | L 22-23 | 13 | 85 | 6.50 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6.5 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Mississippi State100 rush yards | L 35-38 | 19 | 116 | 6.10 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Auburn | L 24-33 | 12 | 41 | 3.40 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Texas A&M100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 42-45 | 16 | 147 | 9.20 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 8.6 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Tennessee100 rush yards | L 31-34 | 19 | 131 | 6.90 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6.8 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Notre Dame | L 13-56 | 15 | 63 | 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4.3 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Memphis | L 31-32 | 15 | 70 | 4.70 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 4.9 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Ole Miss2+ TD | L 35-41 | 13 | 65 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 53 | 7.9 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Arkansas State100 rush yards | W 56-14 | 9 | 116 | 12.90 | 1 | — | — | 12.9 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 9 | 79 | 8.80 | 0 | 2 | 26 | 9.5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2021-2023
Opening stop
New Mexico State
2024
Peak year stop
Arkansas
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Buffalo | 132 | 71.1 | 11 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Buffalo | 683 | 43.4 | 20.1 | 551 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Buffalo | 683 | 43.4 | 20.1 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Buffalo | 397 | 35.7 | 17.4 | -286 |
| 2024 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 787 | 44.4 | 25.5 | 390 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Arkansas | 1,294 | 65.6 | 31.3 | 507 |
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Loss with 163 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
163
Primary metric
163 scrimmage yards and 36.5 usage.
#2
Bowling Green
155
Primary metric
Win with 155 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
155 scrimmage yards and 26.2 usage.
#3
Western Kentucky
152
Primary metric
Loss with 152 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
152 scrimmage yards and 29.2 usage.
#4
Texas
148
Primary metric
Loss with 148 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
148 scrimmage yards and 40.4 usage.
#5
Louisiana
85
Primary metric
Loss with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
85 scrimmage yards and 22.6 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Arkansas
1,294 primary output · 65.6 efficiency · 31.3 usage
68.7
#2
2024 Regular Season · New Mexico State
48.4
787 primary · 44.4 efficiency · 25.5 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Buffalo
43.9
683 primary · 43.4 efficiency · 20.1 usage
10
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.7956
Cicero-North Syracuse · Cicero, NY
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,293
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 51 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.