Usage Score
22.1
Player Dossier
2020-2022Navy
Vincent Terrell Jr.
WR • 5'8" • 170 lbs • Honolulu, HI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Vincent Terrell Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.2
Consistency
18.4
Season Value
41.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Navy
202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Navy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Vincent Terrell Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Navy. Vincent Terrell Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Navy paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Navy
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
18.4
Efficiency
76.2
Usage
22.1
Consistency
18.4
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Memphis: 33. East Carolina: 114. Air Force: -1. Tulsa: 0. SMU: 24. Houston: 5. Temple: 0. Cincinnati: 31. Notre Dame: 15. UCF: 0. Army: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 1 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 100. Air Force: 1 by 0. SMU: 1 by 100. Houston: 1 by 33.3. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins28.5 · n=4 · +13.2 vs Losses
Losses15.3 · n=7 · -13.2 vs Wins
First Half28.3 · n=6 · +19.8 vs Second Half
Second Half8.5 · n=6 · -19.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/10 | @ Army | L 17-20 | — | — | — | 3.4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ UCF | W 17-14 | — | — | — | 5.1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Notre Dame | L 32-35 | — | 1 | 15 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Cincinnati | L 10-20 | — | 1 | 31 | 7 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Temple | W 27-20 | — | — | — | 1.9 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Houston | L 20-38 | — | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 10/14 | @ SMU | L 34-40 | — | 1 | 24 | 4.7 | 24 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Tulsa | W 53-21 | — | — | — | 5.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Air Force | L 10-13 | — | 1 | -1 | 4.7 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards | W 23-20 | — | 3 | 114 | 26.8 | 38 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Memphis | L 13-37 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2020-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Navy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Navy | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Navy | 221 | 76.2 | 22.1 | 221 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
SMU
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Notre Dame
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Navy
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2022 Regular Season · Navy
41.1
221 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 22.1 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Navy
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8711
East Forsyth · Kernersville, NC
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
221
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.