Player Stats

Parker McNeil College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
1,843
Passing yards
1,908
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTroy1303034.8
2021 Regular SeasonTexas Tech00000-
2022 Regular SeasonLouisiana Tech81,8401,908-681863.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Louisiana Tech paired 1,840 primary output with 55 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 55 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Troy, Texas Tech, Louisiana Tech.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Loss with 399 yards of offense and 66.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · Louisiana Tech

Games

8

Primary Metric / G

230

Efficiency

55

Usage

9.4

Consistency

76.3

Best Game by takeover score

North Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 139. Stephen F. Austin: 193. Clemson: 309. South Alabama: 238. UTEP: 252. North Texas: 399. Rice: 26. Middle Tennessee: 284

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 12 by 65.9. Stephen F. Austin: 24 by 50.5. Clemson: 44 by 49.4. South Alabama: 36 by 42.6. UTEP: 30 by 62.2. North Texas: 48 by 66.4. Rice: 9 by 52.4. Middle Tennessee: 36 by 50.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins243 · Games = 3 · +20.8 vs Losses
Losses222.2 · Games = 5 · -20.8 vs Wins