Player Stats

CJ Doggette Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
57
TFL
13.5
Sacks
5.5
QB hurries
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonCincinnati00-0--0-
2023 Regular SeasonCincinnati11-0--036.7
2024 PostseasonOhio1330.50--055.7
2024 Regular SeasonOhio13296.533-055.7
2025 Regular SeasonFlorida Atlantic10246.52.52-052.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Ohio paired 13 primary output with 20.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 20.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Cincinnati, Ohio, Florida Atlantic.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UAB

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

20.5

Usage

7.8

Consistency

39.4

Best Game by takeover score

UAB

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 2. Memphis: 0. Rice: 0. UAB: 5.5. South Florida: 0. Navy: 0.5. Tulsa: 1. Tulane: 1. UConn: 1. East Carolina: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 2 by 28.3. Memphis: 3 by 12.5. Rice: 4 by 16.7. UAB: 4 by 66.7. South Florida: 1 by 4.2. Navy: 2 by 13.3. Tulsa: 1 by 14.2. Tulane: 3 by 22.5. UConn: 2 by 18.3. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.2 · Games = 3 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 7 · -1.5 vs Wins