Usage Score
12.8
Player Profile
Bryce Young
QB • 6'0" • 194 lbs • Pasadena, CA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Bryce Young is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
66.2
Consistency
80.1
Season Value
59.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Alabama
2021212222
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Alabama
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Alabama
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Bryce Young, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Alabama. Bryce Young is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Alabama paired 4,872 primary output with 63.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 66.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Win with 391 yards of offense and 86.2 efficiency. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Alabama
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
292.8
Efficiency
66.2
Usage
12.8
Consistency
80.1
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 311. Utah State: 295. Texas: 251. UL Monroe: 242. Vanderbilt: 391. Arkansas: 177. Tennessee: 451. Mississippi State: 236. LSU: 338. Ole Miss: 219. Unknown: 211. Auburn: 391
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 24 by 67.9. Utah State: 33 by 80.6. Texas: 46 by 67.3. UL Monroe: 21 by 61.9. Vanderbilt: 37 by 79.6. Arkansas: 15 by 60.8. Tennessee: 56 by 60.1. Mississippi State: 39 by 54.8. LSU: 55 by 54.9. Ole Miss: 40 by 57.7. Unknown: 28 by 62.9. Auburn: 35 by 86.2
Split Comparison
Wins279.2 · n=9 · -115.3 vs Losses
Losses394.5 · n=2 · +115.3 vs Wins
First Half277.8 · n=6 · -29.8 vs Second Half
Second Half307.7 · n=6 · +29.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
86.2 vs Auburn
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Kansas State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 45-20 | 15 | 21 | 321 | 71.4 | 5 | 0 | 67.9 | 3 | -10 | -3.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Auburn300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 49-27 | 20 | 30 | 343 | 66.7 | 3 | 1 | 86.2 | 5 | 48 | 9.60 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown | — | 18 | 24 | 221 | 75.0 | 2 | 0 | 62.9 | 4 | -10 | -2.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Ole Miss3+ TD | W 30-24 | 21 | 33 | 209 | 63.6 | 3 | 0 | 57.7 | 7 | 10 | 1.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ LSU300-yard game | L 31-32 | 25 | 51 | 328 | 49.0 | 1 | 1 | 54.9 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Mississippi State | W 30-6 | 21 | 35 | 249 | 60.0 | 2 | 0 | 54.8 | 4 | -13 | -3.30 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Tennessee300-yard game | L 49-52 | 35 | 52 | 455 | 67.3 | 2 | 0 | 60.1 | 4 | -4 | -1 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Arkansas | W 49-26 | 7 | 13 | 173 | 53.8 | 1 | 1 | 60.8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Vanderbilt300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 55-3 | 25 | 36 | 385 | 69.4 | 4 | 0 | 79.6 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs UL Monroe3+ TD | W 63-7 | 13 | 18 | 236 | 72.2 | 3 | 2 | 61.9 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas | W 20-19 | 27 | 39 | 213 | 69.2 | 1 | 0 | 67.3 | 7 | 38 | 5.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Utah State3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 55-0 | 18 | 28 | 195 | 64.3 | 5 | 0 | 80.6 | 5 | 100 | 20 | 1 | 63 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2020-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Alabama | 133 | 43.6 | 4.1 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Alabama | 4,872 | 63.3 | 15.1 | 4,739 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Alabama | 4,872 | 63.3 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Alabama | 3,513 | 66.2 | 12.8 | -1,359 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 3,513 | 66.2 | 12.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Win with 391 yards of offense and 86.2 efficiency.
391
Primary metric
391 total offense with 86.2 efficiency.
#2
Arkansas
548
Primary metric
Win with 548 yards of offense and 69.4 efficiency.
548 total offense with 69.4 efficiency.
#3
Georgia
461
Primary metric
Win with 461 yards of offense and 84.7 efficiency.
461 total offense with 84.7 efficiency.
#4
Tennessee
451
Primary metric
Loss with 451 yards of offense and 60.1 efficiency.
451 total offense with 60.1 efficiency.
#5
Vanderbilt
391
Primary metric
Win with 391 yards of offense and 79.6 efficiency.
391 total offense with 79.6 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Alabama
4,872 primary output · 63.3 efficiency · 15.1 usage
64.4
#2
2021 Regular Season · Alabama
64.4
4,872 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 15.1 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Alabama
59.7
3,513 primary · 66.2 efficiency · 12.8 usage
Milestones
18
250+ passing yards
13
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
19
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9647
West Jones · Laurel, MS
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
8,518
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.