Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2022-2025Utah
Larry Simmons
WR • 6'1" • 190 lbs • Moss Point, MS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Larry Simmons reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.3
Consistency
47.4
Season Value
53
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Southern Miss
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ole Miss • Southern Miss • Utah
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Larry Simmons, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Southern Miss. Larry Simmons reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Larry Simmons played WR for Ole Miss, Southern Miss, and Utah. Across 4 tracked seasons, Larry Simmons recorded -4 rushing yards, 701 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Southern Miss.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Southern Miss paired 421 primary output with 69.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ole Miss, Southern Miss, Utah.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Utah
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
31.1
Efficiency
84.3
Usage
12.5
Consistency
47.4
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 9. Wyoming: 8. West Virginia: 47. Arizona State: 0. BYU: 26. Colorado: 39. Cincinnati: 0. Kansas State: 54. Kansas: 97
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 1 by 60. Wyoming: 1 by 53.3. West Virginia: 2 by 100. BYU: 2 by 86.7. Colorado: 2 by 100. Kansas State: 4 by 90. Kansas: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins31.8 · Games = 8
First Half18 · Games = 5 · -29.5 vs Second Half
Second Half47.5 · Games = 4 · +29.5 vs First Half
All Games31.1 · Games = 9
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Nebraska | W 44-22 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Kansas2+ TD | W 31-21 | — | 3 | 97 | 32.3 | 32.30 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Kansas State | W 51-47 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 11/2 | vs Cincinnati | W 45-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/26 | vs Colorado | W 53-7 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 10/19 | @ BYU | L 21-24 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Arizona State | W 42-10 | — | — | — | 8 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ West Virginia | W 48-14 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 0 | 41 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Wyoming | W 31-6 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Southern Miss
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Utah
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 421 | 69.1 | 15.8 | 421 |
| 2025 Postseason | Utah | 280 | 84.3 | 12.5 | -141 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Utah | 280 | 84.3 | 12.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Primary metric
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Troy
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Florida
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UL Monroe
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Southern Miss
421 primary output · 69.1 efficiency · 15.8 usage
54.2
#2
2025 Postseason · Utah
53
280 primary · 84.3 efficiency · 12.5 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Utah
53
280 primary · 84.3 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.835
Strake Jesuit · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- Wyoming
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
3
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
701
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.