Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 1,699 primary output with 60.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Ole Miss | 13 | 107 | 91 | 16 | 0 | 82.9 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 13 | 1,592 | 1,476 | 116 | 17 | 82.9 |
| 2023 Postseason | Ole Miss | 13 | 120 | 106 | 14 | 1 | 73.7 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 13 | 1,187 | 1,052 | 135 | 16 | 73.7 |
| 2024 Postseason | Ohio State | 16 | 307 | 255 | 52 | 7 | 65.4 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ohio State | 16 | 914 | 805 | 109 | 9 | 65.4 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 1,699 primary output with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 54.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ole Miss, Ohio State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with 187 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
16
Scrimmage Yards / G
76.3
Efficiency
54.1
Usage
25.7
Consistency
62.4
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 121. Texas: 58. Oregon: 85. Tennessee: 43. Akron: 55. Western Michigan: 108. Marshall: 187. Michigan State: 71. Iowa: 76. Oregon: 61. Nebraska: 38. Penn State: 100. Purdue: 45. Northwestern: 84. Indiana: 43. Michigan: 46
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 13 by 88.8. Texas: 12 by 45.1. Oregon: 17 by 52.1. Tennessee: 12 by 36.2. Akron: 13 by 44.1. Western Michigan: 9 by 100. Marshall: 16 by 98.7. Michigan State: 13 by 53.4. Iowa: 14 by 60.1. Oregon: 13 by 32.6. Nebraska: 11 by 32.5. Penn State: 16 by 68.5. Purdue: 13 by 32.6. Northwestern: 16 by 53.5. Indiana: 16 by 27.3. Michigan: 12 by 39.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.