Usage Score
23.3
Player Profile
Brenen Thompson
WR • 5'9" • 170 lbs • Spearman, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Brenen Thompson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90.6
Consistency
71.2
Season Value
71.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Mississippi State
222323242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Texas
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Mississippi State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Brenen Thompson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Mississippi State. Brenen Thompson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 1,054 primary output with 90.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Mississippi State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
81.1
Efficiency
90.6
Usage
23.3
Consistency
71.2
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 106. Southern Miss: 92. Arizona State: 133. Unknown: 53. Northern Illinois: 13. Tennessee: 33. Texas A&M: 54. Florida: 155. Texas: 76. Arkansas: 107. Georgia: 92. Missouri: 60. Ole Miss: 80
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 4 by 100. Southern Miss: 7 by 87.6. Arizona State: 6 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 100. Northern Illinois: 2 by 43.3. Tennessee: 3 by 73.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 100. Florida: 7 by 100. Texas: 6 by 84.4. Arkansas: 6 by 100. Georgia: 4 by 100. Missouri: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 6 by 88.9
Split Comparison
Wins86.3 · n=4 · +4.3 vs Losses
Losses82 · n=8 · -4.3 vs Wins
First Half69.1 · n=7 · -25.9 vs Second Half
Second Half95 · n=6 · +25.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wake Forest
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Wake Forest100 receiving yards | L 29-43 | — | 4 | 106 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 0 | 51 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Ole Miss | L 19-38 | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Missouri | L 27-49 | — | 2 | 60 | 21.7 | 30 | 0 | 54 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Georgia | L 21-41 | — | 4 | 92 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 57 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Arkansas100 receiving yards | W 38-35 | — | 6 | 107 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Texas2+ TD | L 38-45 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 2 | 24 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Florida100 receiving yards | L 21-23 | — | 7 | 155 | 19.1 | 22.10 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Texas A&M | L 9-31 | — | 2 | 54 | 18.3 | 27 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Tennessee | L 34-41 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Northern Illinois | W 38-10 | — | 2 | 13 | 7.7 | 6.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 53 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 24-20 | — | 6 | 133 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 2 | 58 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Southern Miss | W 34-17 | — | 7 | 92 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 0 | 51 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas
2022
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma
2023-2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Mississippi State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas | 32 | 100 | 5.3 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma | 241 | 85.3 | 6.1 | 209 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 241 | 85.3 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 230 | 69.3 | 12.9 | -11 |
| 2025 Postseason | Mississippi State | 1,054 | 90.6 | 23.3 | 824 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 1,054 | 90.6 | 23.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
155
Primary metric
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona State
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Carolina
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arizona
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma State
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Mississippi State
1,054 primary output · 90.6 efficiency · 23.3 usage
71.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · Mississippi State
71.3
1,054 primary · 90.6 efficiency · 23.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Texas
52.1
32 primary · 100 efficiency · 5.3 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9476
Spearman · Spearman, TX
- Committed To
- Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,557
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.