Usage Score
17.3
Player Profile
Shazz Preston
WR • 6'0" • 206 lbs • Saint James, LA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Shazz Preston reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80
Consistency
51.2
Season Value
62.1
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane
2223242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Alabama
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Shazz Preston, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Tulane. Shazz Preston reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Tulane paired 723 primary output with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Tulane.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Tulane
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
51.6
Efficiency
80
Usage
17.3
Consistency
51.2
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 125. Northwestern: 4. South Alabama: 14. Duke: 95. Ole Miss: 35. Tulsa: 54. East Carolina: 26. Army: 86. UTSA: 15. Memphis: 85. Florida Atlantic: 29. Temple: 96. Charlotte: 43. North Texas: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 5 by 100. Northwestern: 1 by 26.7. South Alabama: 1 by 93.3. Duke: 3 by 100. Ole Miss: 3 by 77.8. Tulsa: 5 by 72. East Carolina: 2 by 86.7. Army: 5 by 100. UTSA: 2 by 50. Memphis: 3 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 64.4. Temple: 5 by 100. Charlotte: 3 by 95.6. North Texas: 2 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins49.8 · n=11 · -8.5 vs Losses
Losses58.3 · n=3 · +8.5 vs Wins
First Half50.4 · n=7 · -2.4 vs Second Half
Second Half52.9 · n=7 · +2.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | @ Ole Miss100 receiving yards | L 10-41 | — | 5 | 125 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 57 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs North Texas | W 34-21 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Charlotte | W 27-0 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Temple | W 37-13 | — | 5 | 96 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 1 | 69 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 35-24 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Memphis2+ TD | W 38-32 | — | 3 | 85 | 28.3 | 28.30 | 2 | 65 |
| Thu 10/30 | @ UTSA | L 26-48 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Army | W 24-17 | — | 5 | 86 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 1 | 26 |
| Thu 10/9 | vs East Carolina | W 26-19 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Tulsa | W 31-14 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-45 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Duke | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 95 | 31.7 | 31.70 | 0 | 63 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ South Alabama | W 33-31 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Northwestern | W 23-3 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Tulane
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tulane | 99 | 80 | 7 | 99 |
| 2025 Postseason | Tulane | 723 | 80 | 17.3 | 624 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulane | 723 | 80 | 17.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Army
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Tulane
723 primary output · 80 efficiency · 17.3 usage
62.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · Tulane
62.1
723 primary · 80 efficiency · 17.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Tulane
39.4
99 primary · 80 efficiency · 7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9768
St. James · Saint James, LA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
822
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 18 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.