Player Stats

Le'Veon Moss College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,009
Rushing yards
1,773
Receiving yards
236
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonTexas A&M71281208125.4
2023 Regular SeasonTexas A&M956848484561.4
2024 Regular SeasonTexas A&M99067651411081.2
2025 PostseasonTexas A&M720155051.8
2025 Regular SeasonTexas A&M7387389-2651.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Texas A&M paired 906 primary output with 68.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Auburn

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Texas A&M

Games

7

Scrimmage Yards / G

58.1

Efficiency

55.1

Usage

19.6

Consistency

51.3

Best Game by takeover score

Auburn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 20. UTSA: 17. Utah State: 68. Notre Dame: 81. Auburn: 139. Mississippi State: 36. Florida: 46

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 8 by 23.8. UTSA: 4 by 57.3. Utah State: 10 by 70.8. Notre Dame: 20 by 42.2. Auburn: 21 by 68.9. Mississippi State: 11 by 34.1. Florida: 5 by 88.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins64.5 · Games = 6 · +44.5 vs Losses
Losses20 · Games = 1 · -44.5 vs Wins