Usage Score
15.1
Player Dossier
2022-2025App State
Sam Mbake
WR • 6'3" • 210 lbs • Atlanta, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Sam Mbake reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.1
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
63.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Arkansas
22232525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Arkansas • App State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sam Mbake, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Arkansas. Sam Mbake reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Sam Mbake played WR for Arkansas and App State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Sam Mbake recorded 207 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with App State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas, App State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · App State
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
29.6
Efficiency
73.1
Usage
15.1
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Southern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Southern: 16. Georgia State: 31. Coastal Carolina: 13. Georgia Southern: 29. James Madison: 11. Marshall: 39. Arkansas State: 68
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Southern: 1 by 100. Georgia State: 2 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 1 by 86.7. Georgia Southern: 3 by 64.4. James Madison: 1 by 73.3. Marshall: 7 by 37.1. Arkansas State: 9 by 50.4
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins35 · Games = 2 · +7.6 vs Losses
Losses27.4 · Games = 5 · -7.6 vs Wins
First Half22.3 · Games = 4 · -17.1 vs Second Half
Second Half39.3 · Games = 3 · +17.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia Southern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/29 | vs Georgia Southern | L 10-29 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Arkansas StateHigh volume | L 29-30 | — | 9 | 68 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Marshall | W 26-24 | — | 7 | 39 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ James Madison | L 10-58 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/7 | vs Georgia Southern | L 23-25 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 37-45 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Georgia State | W 41-20 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
App State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202320252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | App State | 207 | 73.1 | 15.1 | 207 |
| 2025 Regular Season | App State | 207 | 73.1 | 15.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68
Primary metric
68 receiving yards with a 50.4 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia State
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 37.1 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia Southern
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Southern
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Arkansas
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2025 Postseason · App State
63.1
207 primary · 73.1 efficiency · 15.1 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · App State
63.1
207 primary · 73.1 efficiency · 15.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8904
North Cobb · Kennesaw, GA
- Committed To
- Arkansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
207
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 8 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.