Usage Score
5.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025Oklahoma
Kobie McKinzie
LB • 6'2" • 236 lbs • Lubbock, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kobie McKinzie shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
20.8
Consistency
35.6
Season Value
21.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma
2223242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kobie McKinzie, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma. Kobie McKinzie shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Kobie McKinzie played LB for Oklahoma. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kobie McKinzie recorded 83 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Oklahoma.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Oklahoma paired 7.5 primary output with 20.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 20.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
20.8
Usage
5.8
Consistency
35.6
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0.5. Michigan: 0.5. Temple: 0. Auburn: 1. Texas: 2. South Carolina: 2.5. Ole Miss: 0. Alabama: 0. Missouri: 0. LSU: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 21.7. Michigan: 5 by 25.8. Temple: 3 by 12.5. Auburn: 3 by 22.5. Texas: 4 by 36.7. South Carolina: 3 by 37.5. Ole Miss: 2 by 8.3. Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Missouri: 3 by 12.5. LSU: 1 by 14.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.7 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 2 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
37.5 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs LSU | W 17-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Missouri | W 17-6 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Alabama | W 23-21 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Ole Miss | L 26-34 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ South Carolina | W 26-7 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ TexasSplash game | L 6-23 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Auburn | W 24-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Temple | W 42-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Michigan | W 24-13 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20222023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 4 | 16 | 2.9 | 4 |
| 2024 Postseason | Oklahoma | 5.5 | 15 | 3.7 | 1.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 5.5 | 15 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 7.5 | 20.8 | 5.8 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#2
South Carolina
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.8 takeover score.
#3
Arkansas State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46 takeover score.
#4
Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.6 takeover score.
#5
West Virginia
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma
7.5 primary output · 20.8 efficiency · 5.8 usage
21.2
#2
2023 Regular Season · Oklahoma
20.2
4 primary · 16 efficiency · 2.9 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Oklahoma
11.6
5.5 primary · 15 efficiency · 3.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9341
Lubbock-Cooper · Lubbock, TX
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
83
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.