Player Dossier

2022-2025

Nebraska

Dane Key

WR • 6'3" • 210 lbs • Lexington, KY, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Dane Key reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

19

Efficiency

70.4

Consistency

65.3

Season Value

54.4

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Kentucky

22222323242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Kentucky • Nebraska
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Dane Key, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Kentucky. Dane Key reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Dane Key played WR for Kentucky and Nebraska. Across 4 tracked seasons, Dane Key recorded -2 rushing yards, 2,322 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Kentucky.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Kentucky paired 715 primary output with 86.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 70.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, Nebraska.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Unknown

Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Nebraska

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

41.1

Efficiency

70.4

Usage

19

Consistency

65.3

Best Game by takeover score

Utah

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah: 28. Cincinnati: 51. Akron: 35. Unknown: 104. Michigan: 36. Maryland: 43. Northwestern: 22. USC: 23. UCLA: 46. Penn State: 48. Iowa: 16

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 4 by 46.7. Cincinnati: 6 by 56.7. Akron: 3 by 77.8. Unknown: 4 by 100. Michigan: 3 by 80. Maryland: 4 by 71.7. Northwestern: 3 by 48.9. USC: 2 by 76.7. UCLA: 3 by 100. Penn State: 4 by 80. Iowa: 3 by 35.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins39.4 · Games = 5 · +9.2 vs Losses
Losses30.2 · Games = 5 · -9.2 vs Wins
First Half49.5 · Games = 6 · +18.5 vs Second Half
Second Half31 · Games = 5 · -18.5 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Unknown

Best efficiency game

100 vs UCLA

Result
Wed 12/31@ UtahL 22-444287709
Fri 11/28vs IowaL 16-403165.35.3006
Sun 11/23@ Penn StateL 10-374481212019
Sun 11/9@ UCLAW 28-2134615.315.30029
Sat 11/1vs USCL 17-2122311.511.50114
Sat 10/25vs NorthwesternW 28-213227.37.30013
Sat 10/11@ MarylandW 34-3144310.810.80119
Sat 9/20vs MichiganL 27-303361212021
Sat 9/13vs Unknown100 receiving yards41042626140
Sat 9/6vs AkronW 68-033511.711.70118
Fri 8/29@ CincinnatiW 20-176518.58.50115

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Kentucky

    2022-2024

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Nebraska

    2025

    Final stop

Season Progression

2022202220232023202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2022 PostseasonKentucky51981.416.6
2022 Regular SeasonKentucky51981.416.60
2023 PostseasonKentucky63688.322.6117
2023 Regular SeasonKentucky63688.322.60
2024 Regular SeasonKentucky71586.630.279
2025 PostseasonNebraska45270.419-263
2025 Regular SeasonNebraska45270.4190

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Ohio

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

145

Primary metric

145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Tennessee

113

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Unknown

90

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Unknown

104

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Florida

83

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2024 Regular Season · Kentucky

715 primary output · 86.6 efficiency · 30.2 usage

69.6

#2

2023 Postseason · Kentucky

66.1

636 primary · 88.3 efficiency · 22.6 usage

#3

2023 Regular Season · Kentucky

66.1

636 primary · 88.3 efficiency · 22.6 usage

Milestones

4

100+ receiving yards

2

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2022 · Rating 0.9129

Frederick Douglass · Lexington, KY

Committed To
Kentucky
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2022

Career Facts

2

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

2,322

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.