Usage Score
22.6
Player Profile
Jordan Hudson
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Garland, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jordan Hudson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.2
Consistency
63.8
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU
2222232324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Primary stop by seasons
- TCU
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Jordan Hudson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU. Jordan Hudson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
SMU paired 766 primary output with 71.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across TCU, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · SMU
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
69.6
Efficiency
71.2
Usage
22.6
Consistency
63.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 17. Unknown: 7. TCU: 62. Syracuse: 47. Stanford: 87. Clemson: 131. Wake Forest: 21. Miami: 136. Boston College: 104. Louisville: 96. California: 58
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 5 by 22.7. Unknown: 1 by 46.7. TCU: 3 by 100. Syracuse: 6 by 52.2. Stanford: 5 by 100. Clemson: 7 by 100. Wake Forest: 4 by 35. Miami: 11 by 82.4. Boston College: 5 by 100. Louisville: 8 by 80. California: 6 by 64.4
Split Comparison
Wins88.3 · n=7 · +41.3 vs Losses
Losses47 · n=3 · -41.3 vs Wins
First Half58.5 · n=6 · -24.5 vs Second Half
Second Half83 · n=5 · +24.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Arizona | W 24-19 | — | 5 | 17 | 3.4 | 3.40 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/30 | @ California | L 35-38 | — | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs LouisvilleHigh volume | W 38-6 | — | 8 | 96 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Boston College100 receiving yards | W 45-13 | — | 5 | 104 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Miami100 receiving yards · High volume | W 26-20 | — | 11 | 136 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Wake Forest | L 12-13 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Clemson100 receiving yards | W 35-24 | — | 7 | 131 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Stanford | W 34-10 | — | 5 | 87 | 15.5 | 17.40 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Syracuse | W 31-18 | — | 6 | 47 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ TCU | L 24-35 | — | 3 | 62 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 1 | 34 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2022
Opening stop
- 2
SMU
2023-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | TCU | 174 | 69.6 | 8.8 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | TCU | 174 | 69.6 | 8.8 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | SMU | 425 | 70.9 | 12 | 251 |
| 2023 Regular Season | SMU | 425 | 70.9 | 12 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | SMU | 422 | 67.4 | 14.5 | -3 |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 422 | 67.4 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | SMU | 766 | 71.2 | 22.6 | 344 |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 766 | 71.2 | 22.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Clemson
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131
Primary metric
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boston College
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 94.3 efficiency score.
#3
Miami
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 82.4 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
76
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · SMU
766 primary output · 71.2 efficiency · 22.6 usage
64.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · SMU
64.4
766 primary · 71.2 efficiency · 22.6 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · SMU
49.7
425 primary · 70.9 efficiency · 12 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9595
Garland · Garland, TX
- Committed To
- TCU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,787
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.