Usage Score
22.6
Player Dossier
2022-2025Alabama
WR • 6'1" • 190 lbs • Hartford, AL, USA
Emmanuel Henderson Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
22.6
Efficiency
77.3
Consistency
38.2
Season Value
58.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Emmanuel Henderson Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Alabama. Emmanuel Henderson Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Alabama paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Kansas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
63.8
Efficiency
77.3
Usage
22.6
Consistency
38.2
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 130. Fresno State: 24. Missouri: 29. West Virginia: 38. Cincinnati: 214. UCF: 53. Texas Tech: 42. Kansas State: 24. Oklahoma State: 19. Arizona: 65. Iowa State: 15. Utah: 113
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 100. Fresno State: 3 by 53.3. Missouri: 3 by 64.4. West Virginia: 6 by 42.2. Cincinnati: 5 by 100. UCF: 5 by 70.7. Texas Tech: 3 by 93.3. Kansas State: 3 by 53.3. Oklahoma State: 2 by 63.3. Arizona: 5 by 86.7. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Utah: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | vs Utah100 receiving yards | L 21-31 | — | 3 | 113 | 30.5 | 37.70 | 0 | 54 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Iowa State | L 14-38 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Arizona | L 20-24 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Oklahoma State | W 38-21 | — | 2 | 19 | 7 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Kansas State | L 17-42 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Texas Tech | L 17-42 | — | 3 | 42 | 10.8 | 14 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ UCF | W 27-20 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Cincinnati100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 34-37 | — | 5 | 214 | 36.3 | 42.80 | 2 | 93 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs West Virginia | W 41-10 | — | 6 | 38 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Missouri | L 31-42 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 130 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 2 | 62 |
| Sat 8/23 | vs Fresno State | W 31-7 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2022-2024
Opening stop
Kansas
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 14 | 93.3 | 4.5 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Alabama | 0 | — | — | -14 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Alabama | 82 | 83.4 | 6.2 | 82 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Kansas | 766 | 77.3 | 22.6 | 684 |
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
214
Primary metric
214 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
14
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
130
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Alabama
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2023 Regular Season · Alabama
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Kansas
58.6
766 primary · 77.3 efficiency · 22.6 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9809
Geneva County · Hartford, AL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
862
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Emmanuel Henderson Jr. quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit