Usage Score
18.7
Player Dossier
2022-2025Oregon State
Darrius Clemons
WR • 6'3" • 214 lbs • Portland, OR, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Darrius Clemons reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60.9
Consistency
48.9
Season Value
57.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Oregon State
22232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Michigan • Oregon State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boise State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darrius Clemons, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Oregon State. Darrius Clemons reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Darrius Clemons played WR for Michigan and Oregon State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Darrius Clemons recorded -6 rushing yards, 332 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Oregon State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Oregon State paired 292 primary output with 60.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Oregon State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boise State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Oregon State
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
41.7
Efficiency
60.9
Usage
18.7
Consistency
48.9
Best Game by takeover score
Boise State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 35. Colorado State: 11. Nevada: 39. UNLV: 70. San José State: 10. Washington State: 4. Boise State: 123
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 3 by 77.8. Colorado State: 2 by 36.7. Nevada: 5 by 52. UNLV: 4 by 100. San José State: 2 by 33.3. Washington State: 1 by 26.7. Boise State: 8 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16.7 · Games = 3 · -43.8 vs Losses
Losses60.5 · Games = 4 · +43.8 vs Wins
First Half38.8 · Games = 4 · -6.9 vs Second Half
Second Half45.7 · Games = 3 · +6.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Boise State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boise State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Boise State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 18-34 | — | 8 | 123 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 1 | 27 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Washington State | W 41-38 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs San José State | L 13-24 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs UNLV | L 25-33 | — | 4 | 70 | 10.7 | 17.50 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Nevada | L 37-42 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Colorado State | W 39-31 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Purdue | W 38-21 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Oregon State
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 7 | 46.7 | 4.8 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan | 33 | 61.7 | 8.2 | 26 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oregon State | 292 | 60.9 | 18.7 | 259 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oregon State | 0 | — | — | -292 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boise State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
UNLV
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UConn
7
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Purdue
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Oregon State
292 primary output · 60.9 efficiency · 18.7 usage
57.1
#2
2022 Regular Season · Michigan
38.5
7 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Michigan
34.8
33 primary · 61.7 efficiency · 8.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9422
Westview · Portland, OR
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
332
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.