Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025UAB
Kaleb Brown
WR • 5'10" • 200 lbs • Chicago, IL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kaleb Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.8
Consistency
43.7
Season Value
58.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Iowa
2223232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ohio State • Iowa • UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kaleb Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Iowa. Kaleb Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kaleb Brown played WR for Ohio State, Iowa, and UAB. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kaleb Brown recorded 59 rushing yards, 493 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UAB.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Iowa paired 215 primary output with 67.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ohio State, Iowa, UAB.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · UAB
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
31.9
Efficiency
82.8
Usage
10.2
Consistency
43.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Akron: 16. Tennessee: 79. Army: 38. Florida Atlantic: 20. Memphis: 0. UConn: 25. Rice: 16. Tulsa: 61
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Akron: 1 by 100. Tennessee: 4 by 100. Army: 3 by 84.4. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100. UConn: 4 by 41.7. Rice: 2 by 53.3. Tulsa: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins25.7 · Games = 3 · -9.9 vs Losses
Losses35.6 · Games = 5 · +9.9 vs Wins
First Half38.3 · Games = 4 · +12.8 vs Second Half
Second Half25.5 · Games = 4 · -12.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Tulsa | W 31-24 | — | 2 | 61 | 30.5 | 30.50 | 0 | 57 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 17-24 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ UConn | L 19-38 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Memphis | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 33-53 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Army | L 13-31 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Tennessee | L 24-56 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 1 | 61 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Akron | W 31-28 | — | 1 | 16 | 10.5 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2022
Opening stop
- 2
Iowa
2023-2024
Peak year stop
- 3
UAB
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Ohio State | 5 | 33.3 | 4.5 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Iowa | 215 | 67.7 | 25 | 210 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Iowa | 215 | 67.7 | 25 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Iowa | 18 | 100 | 5 | -197 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UAB | 255 | 82.8 | 10.2 | 237 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79
Primary metric
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Troy
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Illinois
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 67.6 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Iowa
215 primary output · 67.7 efficiency · 25 usage
58.6
#2
2023 Regular Season · Iowa
58.6
215 primary · 67.7 efficiency · 25 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · UAB
58.4
255 primary · 82.8 efficiency · 10.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9684
St. Rita · Chicago, IL
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
3
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
493
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 17 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.