Player Stats

Nate Burrell College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
80
TFL
7.5
Sacks
4.5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonCalifornia1228-01-010.1
2023 PostseasonCalifornia11411--034.1
2023 Regular SeasonCalifornia11191.5111034.1
2024 PostseasonCalifornia121-0--041.9
2024 Regular SeasonCalifornia122852.511041.9
2025 Regular SeasonCalifornia00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

California paired 9.5 primary output with 18 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 18 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · California

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

18

Usage

4.3

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Miami

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 0. UC Davis: 0. Auburn: 1. San Diego State: 1. Florida State: 2. Miami: 4. Pittsburgh: 0. NC State: 1.5. Oregon State: 0. Syracuse: 0. Stanford: 0. SMU: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 1 by 4.2. UC Davis: 5 by 20.8. Auburn: 1 by 14.2. San Diego State: 3 by 22.5. Florida State: 3 by 32.5. Miami: 2 by 48.3. Pittsburgh: 3 by 12.5. NC State: 3 by 27.5. Oregon State: 1 by 4.2. Syracuse: 4 by 16.7. Stanford: 2 by 8.3. SMU: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 7 · +0.7 vs Wins