Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Missouri paired 1,205 primary output with 80.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Missouri | 13 | 6 | 52 | 0 | 48 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Missouri | 13 | 37 | 325 | 10 | 48 |
| 2023 Postseason | Missouri | 13 | 3 | 15 | 1 | 87.2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Missouri | 13 | 82 | 1,190 | 8 | 87.2 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Missouri | 12 | 60 | 666 | 10 | 71.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Missouri paired 1,205 primary output with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
55.5
Efficiency
67.8
Usage
28.3
Consistency
69.1
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Murray State: 39. Buffalo: 15. Boston College: 117. Vanderbilt: 76. Texas A&M: 82. Massachusetts: 59. Auburn: 49. Alabama: 3. Oklahoma: 55. South Carolina: 69. Mississippi State: 91. Arkansas: 11
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Murray State: 3 by 86.7. Buffalo: 3 by 33.3. Boston College: 6 by 100. Vanderbilt: 6 by 84.4. Texas A&M: 7 by 78.1. Massachusetts: 5 by 78.7. Auburn: 6 by 54.4. Alabama: 3 by 6.7. Oklahoma: 5 by 73.3. South Carolina: 8 by 57.5. Mississippi State: 7 by 86.7. Arkansas: 1 by 73.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.