Player Stats

Jabari Bates College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
540
Rushing yards
479
Receiving yards
61
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonSan José State00000-
2023 PostseasonSan José State11000033.2
2023 Regular SeasonSan José State11653332033.2
2024 PostseasonSan José State13550053
2024 Regular SeasonSan José State1326624917253
2025 Regular SeasonSan José State420419212255.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

San José State paired 204 primary output with 60.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 60.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Idaho

Win with 131 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · San José State

Games

4

Scrimmage Yards / G

51

Efficiency

60.1

Usage

15.6

Consistency

41.9

Best Game by takeover score

Idaho

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 0. Texas: 44. Idaho: 131. Stanford: 29

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 10 by 45.8. Idaho: 11 by 99.6. Stanford: 7 by 35

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins131 · Games = 1 · +106.7 vs Losses
Losses24.3 · Games = 3 · -106.7 vs Wins