Usage Score
14.6
Player Dossier
2022-2025Stanford
David Bailey
LB • 6'3" • 250 lbs • Irvine, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
David Bailey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
40.9
Consistency
47.9
Season Value
46.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Stanford • Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Hawai'i
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Bailey, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech. David Bailey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 37 primary output with 40.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Stanford, Texas Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
2.6
Efficiency
40.9
Usage
14.6
Consistency
47.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 5. Unknown: 1. Kent State: 2. Oregon State: 2. Utah: 2. Houston: 5. Kansas: 6. Arizona State: 5. Oklahoma State: 0.5. Kansas State: 2. BYU: 2. UCF: 2. West Virginia: 0. BYU: 2.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 9 by 87.5. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. Kent State: 1 by 24.2. Oregon State: 2 by 28.3. Utah: 3 by 32.5. Houston: 3 by 62.5. Kansas: 6 by 75. Arizona State: 5 by 70.8. Oklahoma State: 3 by 17.5. Kansas State: 1 by 24.2. BYU: 4 by 36.7. UCF: 3 by 32.5. West Virginia: 4 by 16.7. BYU: 5 by 45.8
Split Comparison
Wins2.4 · n=11 · -2.6 vs Losses
Losses5 · n=2 · +2.6 vs Wins
First Half3.3 · n=7 · +1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2 · n=7 · -1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Oregon
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | vs OregonSplash game | L 0-23 | 9 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | vs BYU | W 34-7 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ West Virginia | W 49-0 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs UCF | W 48-9 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs BYU | W 29-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Kansas State | W 43-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oklahoma State | W 42-0 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arizona State2+ sacks · Splash game | L 22-26 | 5 | 3 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Kansas2+ sacks · Splash game | W 42-17 | 6 | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Houston2+ sacks · Splash game | W 35-11 | 3 | 3 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Utah | W 34-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Oregon State | W 45-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kent State | W 62-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Texas Tech
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Stanford | 9 | 26.9 | 9 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Stanford | 11 | 24.3 | 8.6 | 2 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Stanford | 14 | 26.9 | 12.5 | 3 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas Tech | 37 | 40.9 | 14.6 | 23 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 37 | 40.9 | 14.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Hawai'i
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 69.1 takeover score.
#2
Kansas
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 63.8 takeover score.
#3
Oregon
5
Primary metric
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 63.3 takeover score.
#4
NC State
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#5
UCLA
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
37 primary output · 40.9 efficiency · 14.6 usage
46.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech
46.9
37 primary · 40.9 efficiency · 14.6 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Stanford
27.1
14 primary · 26.9 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
6
Impact games
10
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9718
Mater Dei · Santa Ana, CA
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
156
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 43 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.