Player Stats

Blake Smith College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
136
Receptions
14
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTexas A&M0-00-
2021 Regular SeasonTexas A&M0-00-
2022 Regular SeasonTexas A&M121038
2023 Regular SeasonOklahoma2230138.5
2024 Regular SeasonTexas State0-00-
2025 PostseasonTexas State6122070.7
2025 Regular SeasonTexas State6983070.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Texas State paired 105 primary output with 68.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 68.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Texas State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rice

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Texas State

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

17.5

Efficiency

68.9

Usage

7.9

Consistency

87.6

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Rice: 22. Eastern Michigan: 18. Arizona State: 19. James Madison: 15. Louisiana: 11. UL Monroe: 20

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 60. Arizona State: 2 by 63.3. James Madison: 2 by 50. Louisiana: 1 by 73.3. UL Monroe: 2 by 66.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins20 · Games = 3 · +5 vs Losses
Losses15 · Games = 3 · -5 vs Wins