Usage Score
8
Player Dossier
2020-2024Texas A&M
WR • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Charlotte, NC, USA
Moose Muhammad III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8
Efficiency
51.3
Consistency
38.4
Season Value
26.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Moose Muhammad III, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Moose Muhammad III reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 610 primary output with 94.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 51.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 80th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
11
Efficiency
51.3
Usage
8
Consistency
38.4
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 23. Florida: 20. Arkansas: 4. Missouri: 2. New Mexico State: 6
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 76.7. Florida: 1 by 100. Arkansas: 1 by 26.7. Missouri: 1 by 13.3. New Mexico State: 1 by 40
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2020-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 153 | 84.4 | 22.5 | 153 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 610 | 94.8 | 23.5 | 457 |
| 2023 Postseason | Texas A&M | 345 | 60.2 | 11 | -265 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 345 | 60.2 | 11 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 55 | 51.3 | 8 | -290 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
77
Primary metric
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Mississippi State
119
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
104
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
LSU
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ole Miss
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M
610 primary output · 94.8 efficiency · 23.5 usage
73.5
#2
2021 Regular Season · Texas A&M
51.6
153 primary · 84.4 efficiency · 22.5 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Texas A&M
39.5
345 primary · 60.2 efficiency · 11 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9304
Myers Park · Charlotte, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,163
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Moose Muhammad III quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit