Player Stats

Michael Pratt College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
10,758
Passing yards
9,603
Rushing yards
1,155
Touchdowns
118

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2020 PostseasonTulane1019316825365.1
2020 Regular SeasonTulane101,8501,6382122565.1
2021 Regular SeasonTulane112,5352,3811542666.4
2022 PostseasonTulane1331723483275.3
2022 Regular SeasonTulane133,1712,7763953575.3
2023 Regular SeasonTulane112,6922,4062862771.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason

Tulane paired 3,488 primary output with 66.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 64.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama

Win with 333 yards of offense and 82.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Tulane

Games

11

Primary Metric / G

244.7

Efficiency

64.8

Usage

24.1

Consistency

91

Best Game by takeover score

South Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 333. Nicholls: 223. UAB: 224. Memphis: 268. North Texas: 264. Rice: 303. East Carolina: 246. Tulsa: 203. Florida Atlantic: 250. UTSA: 175. SMU: 203

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 26 by 82.2. Nicholls: 32 by 66.6. UAB: 29 by 73.6. Memphis: 37 by 61.5. North Texas: 36 by 69. Rice: 42 by 66.6. East Carolina: 35 by 67. Tulsa: 34 by 53.8. Florida Atlantic: 32 by 62.5. UTSA: 32 by 59.6. SMU: 46 by 50.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins248.9 · Games = 10 · +45.9 vs Losses
Losses203 · Games = 1 · -45.9 vs Wins