Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
TCU paired 778 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Zach Evans College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 2,324
- Rushing yards
- 1,999
- Receiving yards
- 325
- Touchdowns
- 20
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | TCU | 9 | 491 | 415 | 76 | 4 | 47.8 |
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 6 | 778 | 648 | 130 | 6 | 77 |
| 2022 Postseason | Ole Miss | 12 | 63 | 37 | 26 | 1 | 67.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 12 | 992 | 899 | 93 | 9 | 67.5 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across TCU, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with 207 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Ole Miss
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
87.9
Efficiency
57.2
Usage
19.7
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 63. Troy: 152. Central Arkansas: 53. Georgia Tech: 134. Tulsa: 48. Kentucky: 27. Vanderbilt: 95. Auburn: 159. Texas A&M: 105. Alabama: 12. Arkansas: 207. Mississippi State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 12 by 50.8. Troy: 22 by 69.4. Central Arkansas: 11 by 50.2. Georgia Tech: 18 by 77.5. Tulsa: 10 by 50. Kentucky: 10 by 27.9. Vanderbilt: 13 by 75.9. Auburn: 22 by 70.6. Texas A&M: 10 by 93.8. Alabama: 6 by 20.8. Arkansas: 17 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 0
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins96.6 · Games = 8 · +26.1 vs Losses
Losses70.5 · Games = 4 · -26.1 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Zach Evans
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.