Usage Score
19.7
Player Dossier
2020-2022TCU
Zach Evans
RB • 6'0" • 215 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Zach Evans leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
57.2
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
58.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · TCU
20212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- TCU • Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zach Evans, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · TCU. Zach Evans leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.2 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
TCU paired 778 primary output with 72.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across TCU, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with 207 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Ole Miss
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
87.9
Efficiency
57.2
Usage
19.7
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 63. Troy: 152. Unknown: 53. Georgia Tech: 134. Tulsa: 48. Kentucky: 27. Vanderbilt: 95. Auburn: 159. Texas A&M: 105. Alabama: 12. Arkansas: 207. Mississippi State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 12 by 50.8. Troy: 22 by 69.4. Unknown: 11 by 50.2. Georgia Tech: 18 by 77.5. Tulsa: 10 by 50. Kentucky: 10 by 27.9. Vanderbilt: 13 by 75.9. Auburn: 22 by 70.6. Texas A&M: 10 by 93.8. Alabama: 6 by 20.8. Arkansas: 17 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 0
Split Comparison
Wins102.9 · n=7 · +32.4 vs Losses
Losses70.5 · n=4 · -32.4 vs Wins
First Half79.5 · n=6 · -16.8 vs Second Half
Second Half96.3 · n=6 · +16.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | vs Texas Tech | L 25-42 | 8 | 37 | 4.60 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 5.3 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Mississippi State | L 22-24 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Arkansas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 27-42 | 17 | 207 | 12.20 | 1 | — | — | 12.2 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Alabama | L 24-30 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Texas A&M | W 31-28 | 8 | 75 | 9.40 | 0 | 2 | 30 | 10.5 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Auburn100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 48-34 | 21 | 136 | 6.50 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 7.2 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Vanderbilt | W 52-28 | 11 | 80 | 7.30 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 7.3 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Kentucky | W 22-19 | 9 | 24 | 2.70 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2.7 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Tulsa | W 35-27 | 10 | 48 | 4.80 | 1 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Georgia Tech100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 42-0 | 18 | 134 | 7.40 | 2 | — | — | 7.4 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 11 | 53 | 4.80 | 1 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Troy100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 28-10 | 20 | 130 | 6.50 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 6.9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2020-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Ole Miss
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | TCU | 491 | 61.5 | 12.7 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 778 | 72.4 | 30.8 | 287 |
| 2022 Postseason | Ole Miss | 1,055 | 57.2 | 19.7 | 277 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1,055 | 57.2 | 19.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Loss with 207 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
207
Primary metric
207 scrimmage yards and 23 usage.
#2
California
204
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
204 scrimmage yards and 34.3 usage.
#3
SMU
183
Primary metric
Loss with 183 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
183 scrimmage yards and 39.1 usage.
#4
Louisiana Tech
130
Primary metric
Win with 130 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
130 scrimmage yards and 15.2 usage.
#5
Kansas
100
Primary metric
Win with 100 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
100 scrimmage yards and 25.5 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · TCU
778 primary output · 72.4 efficiency · 30.8 usage
63.7
#2
2022 Postseason · Ole Miss
58.3
1,055 primary · 57.2 efficiency · 19.7 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Ole Miss
58.3
1,055 primary · 57.2 efficiency · 19.7 usage
Milestones
11
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9924
North Shore · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- TCU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,324
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.