Player Stats

Ashton Gillotte College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
126
TFL
36
Sacks
25
QB hurries
20
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 PostseasonLouisville11311--042.2
2021 Regular SeasonLouisville1116633-042.2
2022 PostseasonLouisville11111--050.1
2022 Regular SeasonLouisville11226.55.511050.1
2023 Regular SeasonLouisville134111.5106-072.9
2024 Regular SeasonLouisville1243104.510-066

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Louisville paired 27.5 primary output with 34.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 34.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Louisville

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

2.0

Efficiency

34.5

Usage

10.9

Consistency

49.6

Best Game by takeover score

Pittsburgh

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Austin Peay: 3.5. Jacksonville State: 0. Georgia Tech: 3. Notre Dame: 1. SMU: 0. Virginia: 4. Miami: 0. Boston College: 2.5. Clemson: 1. Stanford: 2. Pittsburgh: 6. Kentucky: 1.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Austin Peay: 4 by 51.7. Jacksonville State: 3 by 12.5. Georgia Tech: 2 by 38.3. Notre Dame: 3 by 22.5. SMU: 1 by 4.2. Virginia: 3 by 52.5. Miami: 2 by 8.3. Boston College: 9 by 62.5. Clemson: 7 by 39.2. Stanford: 2 by 28.3. Pittsburgh: 3 by 62.5. Kentucky: 4 by 31.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.7 · Games = 8 · +1.9 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 4 · -1.9 vs Wins