Usage Score
10.8
Player Dossier
2021-2025Wake Forest
DL • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Langston Hardy shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.8
Efficiency
42.4
Consistency
56.5
Season Value
52.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Langston Hardy, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Wake Forest. Langston Hardy shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.4 disruption score.
Langston Hardy played DL for UConn and Wake Forest. Across 5 tracked seasons, Langston Hardy recorded 113 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Wake Forest.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 30 primary output with 42.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 42.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UConn, Wake Forest.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Carolina
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.3
Efficiency
42.4
Usage
10.8
Consistency
56.5
Best Game by takeover score
Western Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 1. Kennesaw State: 1. Western Carolina: 7. NC State: 2. Georgia Tech: 1.5. Virginia Tech: 2. Oregon State: 3. SMU: 1.5. Florida State: 1. Virginia: 1.5. North Carolina: 2. Delaware: 2. Duke: 4.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 0 by 10. Kennesaw State: 4 by 26.7. Western Carolina: 4 by 66.7. NC State: 7 by 49.2. Georgia Tech: 7 by 44.2. Virginia Tech: 4 by 36.7. Oregon State: 7 by 59.2. SMU: 5 by 35.8. Florida State: 4 by 26.7. Virginia: 7 by 44.2. North Carolina: 3 by 32.5. Delaware: 5 by 40.8. Duke: 8 by 78.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Western Carolina
Best efficiency game
78.3 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ Mississippi State | W 43-29 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ DukeSplash game | L 32-49 | 8 | 3 | — | 2 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs DelawareSplash game | W 52-14 | 5 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs North CarolinaSplash game | W 28-12 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Virginia | W 16-9 | 7 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Florida State | L 7-42 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs SMU | W 13-12 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Oregon StateSplash game | W 39-14 | 7 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Virginia TechSplash game | W 30-23 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Georgia Tech | L 29-30 | 7 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/11 | vs NC StateSplash game | L 24-34 | 7 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Western Carolina2+ sacks · Splash game | W 42-10 | 4 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Kennesaw State | W 10-9 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UConn
2021-2024
Opening stop
Wake Forest
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UConn | 0 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UConn | 14.5 | 27.4 | 8.2 | 14.5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Wake Forest | 30 | 42.4 | 10.8 | 15.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 30 | 42.4 | 10.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Western Carolina
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 60.6 takeover score.
#2
Buffalo
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.4 takeover score.
#3
Massachusetts
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.5 takeover score.
#4
Duke
4.5
Primary metric
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.6 takeover score.
#5
Georgia State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 41.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
30 primary output · 42.4 efficiency · 10.8 usage
52.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Wake Forest
52.4
30 primary · 42.4 efficiency · 10.8 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · UConn
35.6
0 primary · 5.6 efficiency · 1.2 usage
1
Impact games
11
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8278
Sandalwood · Jacksonville, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
113
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.