Usage Score
14
Player Dossier
2022-2025Wake Forest
Eni Falayi
TE • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Boston, MA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Eni Falayi reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
61.8
Consistency
65.7
Season Value
60.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
22232525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Massachusetts • Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kennesaw State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eni Falayi, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Wake Forest. Eni Falayi reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Eni Falayi played TE for Massachusetts and Wake Forest. Across 3 tracked seasons, Eni Falayi recorded 254 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Wake Forest.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 228 primary output with 61.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 61.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Massachusetts, Wake Forest.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kennesaw State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
28.5
Efficiency
61.8
Usage
14
Consistency
65.7
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 10. Kennesaw State: 52. NC State: 42. Georgia Tech: 39. Virginia Tech: 50. SMU: 25. Virginia: 6. Duke: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 2 by 33.3. Kennesaw State: 4 by 86.7. NC State: 1 by 100. Georgia Tech: 3 by 86.7. Virginia Tech: 4 by 83.3. SMU: 3 by 55.6. Virginia: 1 by 40. Duke: 3 by 8.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins28.6 · Games = 5 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses28.3 · Games = 3 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half35.8 · Games = 4 · +14.5 vs Second Half
Second Half21.3 · Games = 4 · -14.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kennesaw State
Best efficiency game
100 vs NC State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ Mississippi State | W 43-29 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Duke | L 32-49 | — | 3 | 4 | 1.3 | 1.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Virginia | W 16-9 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs SMU | W 13-12 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Virginia Tech | W 30-23 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Georgia Tech | L 29-30 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 9/11 | vs NC State | L 24-34 | — | 1 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 0 | 42 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Kennesaw State | W 10-9 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Massachusetts
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Wake Forest
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202320252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 12 | 40 | 10.5 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 14 | 93.3 | 5.6 | 2 |
| 2025 Postseason | Wake Forest | 228 | 61.8 | 14 | 214 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 228 | 61.8 | 14 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kennesaw State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52
Primary metric
52 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
14
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia Tech
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#4
NC State
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Tech
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
228 primary output · 61.8 efficiency · 14 usage
60.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Wake Forest
60.4
228 primary · 61.8 efficiency · 14 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Massachusetts
38.8
14 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 5.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8
Williston Northampton School · Peabody, MA
- Committed To
- Massachusetts
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
254
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 12 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.