Player Stats

Glynn Johnson Jr College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
795
Receptions
60
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State412101145.9
2022 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State0-00-
2023 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State2213041.9
2024 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State1119346266.9
2025 Regular SeasonNew Mexico State1027335357.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

New Mexico State paired 346 primary output with 76 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 59.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · New Mexico State

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

33.5

Efficiency

59.5

Usage

12.4

Consistency

31.4

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Bryant: 24. Tulsa: 30. Louisiana Tech: 157. Sam Houston: 4. Missouri State: 4. Western Kentucky: 8. Kennesaw State: 22. Tennessee: 18. UTEP: 47. Middle Tennessee: 21

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bryant: 2 by 80. Tulsa: 4 by 50. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 100. Sam Houston: 1 by 26.7. Missouri State: 1 by 26.7. Western Kentucky: 1 by 53.3. Kennesaw State: 2 by 73.3. Tennessee: 2 by 60. UTEP: 4 by 78.3. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins26.3 · Games = 4 · -12.1 vs Losses
Losses38.3 · Games = 6 · +12.1 vs Wins