Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 3,767 primary output with 67.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Duke | 6 | 554 | 381 | 173 | 3 | 48.3 |
| 2022 Postseason | Duke | 13 | 236 | 173 | 63 | 2 | 75.1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Duke | 13 | 3,429 | 2,794 | 635 | 31 | 75.1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Duke | 7 | 1,454 | 1,102 | 352 | 7 | 59.1 |
| 2024 Postseason | Notre Dame | 16 | 954 | 769 | 185 | 8 | 82.7 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 16 | 2,813 | 2,092 | 721 | 30 | 82.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 3,767 primary output with 67.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 67.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Duke, Notre Dame.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with 295 yards of offense and 65.8 efficiency. It landed in the 93.8th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
16
Primary Metric / G
235.4
Efficiency
67.7
Usage
33.6
Consistency
88.2
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 295. Penn State: 258. Georgia: 170. Indiana: 231. Texas A&M: 221. Northern Illinois: 179. Purdue: 212. Miami (OH): 297. Louisville: 215. Stanford: 260. Georgia Tech: 254. Navy: 261. Florida State: 285. Virginia: 246. Army: 178. USC: 205
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 48 by 65.8. Penn State: 41 by 57.7. Georgia: 38 by 62.7. Indiana: 43 by 59.7. Texas A&M: 42 by 64.1. Northern Illinois: 43 by 48.6. Purdue: 27 by 79.5. Miami (OH): 37 by 78.8. Louisville: 36 by 68.2. Stanford: 28 by 77.8. Georgia Tech: 39 by 66.1. Navy: 31 by 78.9. Florida State: 38 by 70.5. Virginia: 41 by 62.1. Army: 21 by 77.3. USC: 34 by 64.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.