Player Dossier

2021-2025

TCU

Joseph Manjack

WR • 6'3" • 205 lbs • Tomball, TX, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Joseph Manjack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

18.5

Efficiency

76.9

Consistency

61.3

Season Value

62.8

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Houston

21222223242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
3
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
USC • Houston • TCU
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Texas

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Joseph Manjack, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Houston. Joseph Manjack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Joseph Manjack played WR for USC, Houston, and TCU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Joseph Manjack recorded 74 passing yards, -9 rushing yards, and 1,722 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Houston.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Houston paired 577 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, Houston, TCU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Unknown

Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · TCU

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

52.6

Efficiency

76.9

Usage

18.5

Consistency

61.3

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. USC: 28. North Carolina: 24. Unknown: 114. SMU: 15. Arizona State: 83. Colorado: 65. Kansas State: 8. Iowa State: 48. BYU: 40. Houston: 95. Cincinnati: 59

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 3 by 62.2. North Carolina: 2 by 80. Unknown: 4 by 100. SMU: 3 by 33.3. Arizona State: 6 by 92.2. Colorado: 5 by 86.7. Kansas State: 1 by 53.3. Iowa State: 3 by 100. BYU: 3 by 88.9. Houston: 9 by 70.4. Cincinnati: 5 by 78.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins47.7 · Games = 6 · +2.9 vs Losses
Losses44.8 · Games = 4 · -2.9 vs Wins
First Half54.8 · Games = 6 · +4.8 vs Second Half
Second Half50 · Games = 5 · -4.8 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Unknown

Best efficiency game

100 vs Iowa State

Result
Wed 12/31vs USCW 30-273289.39.30015
Sat 11/29vs CincinnatiW 45-235598.211.80144
Sat 11/22@ HoustonHigh volumeW 17-1499510.610.60022
Sun 11/16@ BYUL 13-4434013.313.30019
Sat 11/8vs Iowa StateL 17-203481616022
Sat 10/11@ Kansas StateL 28-41188808
Sat 10/4vs ColoradoW 35-215651313125
Sat 9/27@ Arizona StateL 24-2768313.813.80032
Sat 9/20vs SMUW 35-243155.3516
Sun 9/14vs Unknown100 receiving yards411428.528.50051
Tue 9/2@ North CarolinaW 48-142241212018

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    USC

    2021

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Houston

    2022-2024

    Peak year stop

  3. 3

    TCU

    2025

    Final stop

Season Progression

2021202220222023202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2021 Regular SeasonUSC6741.35.3
2022 PostseasonHouston1487117.681
2022 Regular SeasonHouston1487117.60
2023 Regular SeasonHouston57780.821.4429
2024 Regular SeasonHouston35172.912.9-226
2025 PostseasonTCU57976.918.5228
2025 Regular SeasonTCU57976.918.50

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Texas

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

88

Primary metric

88 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.

#2

Unknown

114

Primary metric

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

UCF

74

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Oklahoma

72

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Texas Tech

81

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2023 Regular Season · Houston

577 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 21.4 usage

68.7

#2

2025 Postseason · TCU

62.8

579 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 18.5 usage

#3

2025 Regular Season · TCU

62.8

579 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 18.5 usage

Milestones

1

100+ receiving yards

1

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2026 · Rating 0.8556

Southlake Carroll · Southlake, TX

Committed To
Pittsburgh
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2026

Career Facts

3

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

1,722

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.