Usage Score
20.9
Player Dossier
2021-2025Oklahoma
WR • 5'9" • 188 lbs • Belleville, MI, USA
Deion Burks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.9
Efficiency
65.6
Consistency
56
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deion Burks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue. Deion Burks reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Deion Burks played WR for Purdue and Oklahoma. Across 5 tracked seasons, Deion Burks recorded 48 rushing yards, 1,669 receiving yards, and 7 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Purdue paired 629 primary output with 72.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.7
Efficiency
65.6
Usage
20.9
Consistency
56
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 107. Unknown: 88. Michigan: 101. Temple: 36. Auburn: 40. Kent State: 10. Texas: 64. South Carolina: 19. Ole Miss: 32. Tennessee: 45. Alabama: 19. Missouri: -2. LSU: 61
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 7 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 83.8. Michigan: 7 by 96.2. Temple: 3 by 80. Auburn: 6 by 44.4. Kent State: 2 by 33.3. Texas: 5 by 85.3. South Carolina: 2 by 63.3. Ole Miss: 4 by 53.3. Tennessee: 6 by 50. Alabama: 2 by 63.3. Missouri: 2 by 0. LSU: 4 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Alabama100 receiving yards | L 24-34 | — | 7 | 107 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs LSU | W 17-13 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Missouri | W 17-6 | — | 2 | -2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Alabama | W 23-21 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Tennessee | W 33-27 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Ole Miss | L 26-34 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ South Carolina | W 26-7 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Texas | L 6-23 | — | 5 | 64 | 10.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Kent State | W 44-0 | — | 2 | 10 | 1.3 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Auburn | W 24-17 | — | 6 | 40 | 5.3 | 6.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Temple | W 42-3 | — | 3 | 36 | 6.8 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Michigan100 receiving yards | W 24-13 | — | 7 | 101 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 88 | 12.5 | 12.60 | 1 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2021-2023
Opening stop
Oklahoma
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Purdue | 26 | 100 | 3.8 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Purdue | 26 | 100 | 3.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Purdue | 149 | 58.5 | 7.9 | 123 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 149 | 58.5 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Purdue | 629 | 72.8 | 20.9 | 480 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 245 | 53.5 | 33.5 | -384 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oklahoma | 620 | 65.6 | 20.9 | 375 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 620 | 65.6 | 20.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 96.2 efficiency score.
#3
Fresno State
152
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 76.2 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
629 primary output · 72.8 efficiency · 20.9 usage
61.9
#2
2025 Postseason · Oklahoma
59.5
620 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 20.9 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Oklahoma
59.5
620 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 20.9 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8544
Cherry Creek · Englewood, CO
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,669
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.