Player Stats

Xavier Worthy College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,755
Receptions
197
Touchdowns
29

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonTexas12629811279.4
2022 PostseasonTexas13784075.6
2022 Regular SeasonTexas13536761075.6
2023 PostseasonTexas14245084.8
2023 Regular SeasonTexas1473969784.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Texas paired 1,014 primary output with 86 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 86 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: TCU

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Texas

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

72.4

Efficiency

86

Usage

24.4

Consistency

71.8

Best Game by takeover score

TCU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington: 45. Rice: 90. Alabama: 75. Wyoming: 56. Baylor: 31. Kansas: 93. Oklahoma: 108. Houston: 92. BYU: 27. Kansas State: 48. TCU: 137. Iowa State: 77. Texas Tech: 49. Oklahoma State: 86

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 2 by 100. Rice: 7 by 85.7. Alabama: 5 by 100. Wyoming: 4 by 93.3. Baylor: 3 by 68.9. Kansas: 7 by 88.6. Oklahoma: 8 by 90. Houston: 6 by 100. BYU: 4 by 45. Kansas State: 5 by 64. TCU: 10 by 91.3. Iowa State: 4 by 100. Texas Tech: 4 by 81.7. Oklahoma State: 6 by 95.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins71.8 · Games = 12 · -4.8 vs Losses
Losses76.5 · Games = 2 · +4.8 vs Wins