Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
UAB paired 13 primary output with 25.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
BJ Mayes College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 68
- TFL
- 1
- Passes defended
- 15
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | UAB | 12 | 41 | 1 | 0 | - | 10 | 0 | 57.6 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 11 | 7 | - | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 44.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 11 | 20 | - | 0 | - | 4 | 0 | 44.5 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
18.4
Usage
3.8
Consistency
58.7
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 2. McNeese: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Arkansas: 0. Missouri: 1. Mississippi State: 1. LSU: 2. South Carolina: 0. New Mexico State: 1. Auburn: 1. Texas: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 7 by 49.2. McNeese: 1 by 4.2. Bowling Green: 1 by 4.2. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. Missouri: 2 by 18.3. Mississippi State: 4 by 26.7. LSU: 2 by 28.3. South Carolina: 4 by 16.7. New Mexico State: 1 by 14.2. Auburn: 1 by 14.2. Texas: 2 by 18.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.7 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 4 · +0.3 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring BJ Mayes
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.