Player Stats

Charles Esters III College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
51
TFL
10.5
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
8
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonTexas Tech00-0--0-
2022 Regular SeasonTexas Tech11-0--037
2023 PostseasonTexas Tech931.50--046.8
2023 Regular SeasonTexas Tech9223321046.8
2024 PostseasonTexas Tech70-0--047.8
2024 Regular SeasonTexas Tech71530.531047.8
2025 Regular SeasonTexas Tech8103032049.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Texas Tech paired 8 primary output with 15.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 15.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: BYU

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

15.2

Usage

4.1

Consistency

73

Best Game by takeover score

BYU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 1. Kansas: 0.5. Oklahoma State: 1. Kansas State: 0. BYU: 2. UCF: 1. West Virginia: 1.5. BYU: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 2 by 18.3. Kansas: 2 by 13.3. Oklahoma State: 1 by 14.2. Kansas State: 1 by 4.2. BYU: 0 by 20. UCF: 1 by 14.2. West Virginia: 3 by 27.5. BYU: 0 by 10

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half0.6 · Games = 4 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · Games = 4 · +0.8 vs First Half