Player Stats

Jimmy Valsin III College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
162
Receptions
12
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonOregon State118043.4
2023 PostseasonOregon State5351171.2
2023 Regular SeasonOregon State58103171.2
2024 Regular SeasonOregon State0-00-
2025 Regular SeasonOregon State0-00-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Oregon State paired 154 primary output with 82.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 82.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Oregon State

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

30.8

Efficiency

82.2

Usage

12.3

Consistency

61.4

Best Game by takeover score

Arizona

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 51. UC Davis: 10. Arizona: 54. Stanford: 13. Oregon: 26

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 3 by 100. UC Davis: 1 by 66.7. Arizona: 3 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 86.7. Oregon: 3 by 57.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins11.5 · Games = 2 · -32.2 vs Losses
Losses43.7 · Games = 3 · +32.2 vs Wins