Player Stats

J.Michael Sturdivant College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,073
Receptions
150
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonCalifornia3-00100
2022 Regular SeasonCalifornia1265755784
2023 PostseasonUCLA134142157.6
2023 Regular SeasonUCLA1332455357.6
2024 Regular SeasonUCLA722315248.3
2025 Regular SeasonFlorida1227406359.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season

California paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 77.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across California, UCLA, Florida.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Florida

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

33.8

Efficiency

77.1

Usage

12.2

Consistency

68.1

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Long Island University: 7. South Florida: 21. LSU: 43. Miami: 5. Texas: 42. Texas A&M: 53. Mississippi State: 43. Georgia: 21. Kentucky: 29. Ole Miss: 62. Tennessee: 22. Florida State: 58

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Long Island University: 2 by 23.3. South Florida: 2 by 70. LSU: 3 by 95.6. Miami: 1 by 33.3. Texas: 2 by 100. Texas A&M: 2 by 100. Mississippi State: 3 by 95.6. Georgia: 2 by 70. Kentucky: 3 by 64.4. Ole Miss: 2 by 100. Tennessee: 2 by 73.3. Florida State: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins37.5 · Games = 4 · +5.5 vs Losses
Losses32 · Games = 8 · -5.5 vs Wins