Player Stats

Josh Sterzer College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
419
Receptions
44
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonUtah State0-00-
2021 Regular SeasonUtah State3421017
2022 PostseasonUtah State8212043.4
2022 Regular SeasonUtah State89117143.4
2023 PostseasonUtah State415026.3
2023 Regular SeasonUtah State416026.3
2024 Regular SeasonUtah State1020202463
2025 Regular SeasonUtah State6756142.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Utah State paired 202 primary output with 72.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 54.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Air Force

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Utah State

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

9.3

Efficiency

54.7

Usage

6.9

Consistency

63.9

Best Game by takeover score

Air Force

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 0. Air Force: 18. McNeese: 5. Vanderbilt: 16. San José State: 8. Boise State: 9

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 1 by 100. McNeese: 1 by 33.3. Vanderbilt: 2 by 53.3. San José State: 2 by 26.7. Boise State: 1 by 60

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins7.8 · Games = 4 · -4.8 vs Losses
Losses12.5 · Games = 2 · +4.8 vs Wins