Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2020-2025Kansas
Levi Wentz
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Levi Wentz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.7
Consistency
54.3
Season Value
61.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Kansas
20212225
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Old Dominion • Kansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Levi Wentz, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Kansas. Levi Wentz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Levi Wentz played WR for Old Dominion and Kansas. Across 4 tracked seasons, Levi Wentz recorded 300 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Kansas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Kansas paired 258 primary output with 83.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Old Dominion, Kansas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Kansas
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
28.7
Efficiency
83.7
Usage
10.1
Consistency
54.3
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 32. Fresno State: 15. Missouri: 56. West Virginia: 41. Cincinnati: 18. Texas Tech: 10. Arizona: 11. Iowa State: 53. Utah: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 53.3. Fresno State: 1 by 100. Missouri: 2 by 100. West Virginia: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 2 by 60. Texas Tech: 1 by 66.7. Arizona: 1 by 73.3. Iowa State: 3 by 100. Utah: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins28 · Games = 2 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses28.3 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half32.4 · Games = 5 · +8.4 vs Second Half
Second Half24 · Games = 4 · -8.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | vs Utah | L 21-31 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Iowa State | L 14-38 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Arizona | L 20-24 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Texas Tech | L 17-42 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Cincinnati | L 34-37 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs West Virginia | W 41-10 | — | 1 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Missouri | L 31-42 | — | 2 | 56 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 50 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 8/23 | vs Fresno State | W 31-7 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Old Dominion
2020-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Kansas
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202120222025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 42 | 100 | 4.8 | 42 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Kansas | 258 | 83.7 | 10.1 | 216 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
58
Primary metric
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa State
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Missouri
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Hawai'i
12
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
South Alabama
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Kansas
258 primary output · 83.7 efficiency · 10.1 usage
61.7
#2
2022 Regular Season · Old Dominion
55.2
42 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Old Dominion
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.83
Pine-Richland · Gibsonia, PA
- Committed To
- Old Dominion
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
300
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 12 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.