Usage Score
23.5
Player Dossier
2020-2025Utah State
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • Las Vegas, NV, USA
Miles Davis leans balanced backfield option traits and 53.3 efficiency.
Usage Score
23.5
Efficiency
53.3
Consistency
51.1
Season Value
57
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Utah State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Miles Davis, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Utah State. Miles Davis leans balanced backfield option traits and 53.3 efficiency.
Miles Davis played RB for BYU and Utah State. Across 6 tracked seasons, Miles Davis recorded 1,200 rushing yards, 332 receiving yards, and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Utah State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Utah State paired 933 primary output with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 53.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across BYU, Utah State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 157 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
71.8
Efficiency
53.3
Usage
23.5
Consistency
51.1
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 42. UTEP: 149. Texas A&M: 59. Air Force: 54. Unknown: 157. Vanderbilt: 23. Hawai'i: 114. San José State: 50. New Mexico: 113. Nevada: 33. UNLV: 56. Fresno State: 43. Boise State: 40
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 8 by 30.6. UTEP: 18 by 80.3. Texas A&M: 13 by 50.2. Air Force: 9 by 62.5. Unknown: 18 by 86.3. Vanderbilt: 8 by 16.1. Hawai'i: 18 by 68.9. San José State: 10 by 52.1. New Mexico: 12 by 89.2. Nevada: 11 by 31.3. UNLV: 12 by 45.7. Fresno State: 13 by 33.6. Boise State: 9 by 46.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
89.2 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/22 | vs Washington State | L 21-34 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 5.3 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Boise State | L 24-25 | 8 | 36 | 4.50 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.4 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Fresno State | W 28-17 | 12 | 38 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3.3 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ UNLV | L 26-29 | 10 | 42 | 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 4.7 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Nevada2+ TD | W 51-14 | 11 | 33 | 3 | 2 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ New Mexico100 rush yards | L 14-33 | 10 | 110 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9.4 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs San José State | W 30-25 | 10 | 50 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Hawai'i100 rush yards | L 26-44 | 15 | 102 | 6.80 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Vanderbilt | L 35-55 | 6 | 4 | 0.70 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 2.9 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Unknown100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | — | 13 | 118 | 9.10 | 1 | 5 | 39 | 8.7 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Air Force | W 49-30 | 9 | 54 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Texas A&M2+ TD | L 22-44 | 10 | 50 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 4.5 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTEP | W 28-16 | 12 | 88 | 7.30 | 1 | 6 | 61 | 8.3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
BYU
2020-2024
Opening stop
Utah State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | BYU | 139 | 57.5 | 7.6 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | BYU | -7 | 0 | 1 | -146 |
| 2021 Regular Season | BYU | -7 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | BYU | 252 | 34.9 | 12.2 | 259 |
| 2023 Regular Season | BYU | 71 | 41.6 | 9.2 | -181 |
| 2024 Regular Season | BYU | 144 | 54.9 | 8.2 | 73 |
| 2025 Postseason | Utah State | 933 | 53.3 | 23.5 | 789 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Utah State | 933 | 53.3 | 23.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Win with 152 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
152
Primary metric
152 scrimmage yards and 30.4 usage.
#2
Unknown
157
Primary metric
Game with 157 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
157 scrimmage yards and 28.1 usage.
#3
UTEP
149
Primary metric
Win with 149 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
149 scrimmage yards and 36 usage.
#4
Unknown
61
Primary metric
Game with 61 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
61 scrimmage yards and 9.8 usage.
#5
SMU
48
Primary metric
Win with 48 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
48 scrimmage yards and 10 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Utah State
933 primary output · 53.3 efficiency · 23.5 usage
57
#2
2025 Regular Season · Utah State
57
933 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 23.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · BYU
37.3
144 primary · 54.9 efficiency · 8.2 usage
5
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.81
Las Vegas · Las Vegas, NV
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,532
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 35 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.