Usage Score
19
Player Dossier
2020-2024Kansas
Quentin Skinner
WR • 6'5" • 195 lbs • Claremore, OK, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Quentin Skinner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
91.1
Consistency
56.8
Season Value
65.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Kansas
20212222232324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Kansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quentin Skinner, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Kansas. Quentin Skinner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Quentin Skinner played WR for Kansas. Across 5 tracked seasons, Quentin Skinner recorded 71 rushing yards, 1,584 receiving yards, and 5 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Kansas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Kansas paired 587 primary output with 92.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 91.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Kansas
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
61.9
Efficiency
91.1
Usage
19
Consistency
56.8
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 25. Illinois: 42. West Virginia: 22. TCU: 16. Arizona State: 130. Houston: 59. Iowa State: 135. BYU: 51. Baylor: 77
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 100. Illinois: 3 by 93.3. West Virginia: 2 by 73.3. TCU: 2 by 53.3. Arizona State: 6 by 100. Houston: 2 by 100. Iowa State: 4 by 100. BYU: 2 by 100. Baylor: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins81.7 · Games = 3 · +24.3 vs Losses
Losses57.4 · Games = 5 · -24.3 vs Wins
First Half47 · Games = 5 · -33.5 vs Second Half
Second Half80.5 · Games = 4 · +33.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Baylor
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Baylor | L 17-45 | — | 3 | 77 | 25.7 | 25.70 | 0 | 33 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ BYU | W 17-13 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Iowa State100 receiving yards | W 45-36 | — | 4 | 135 | 33.8 | 33.80 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Houston | W 42-14 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 1 | 48 |
| Sun 10/6 | @ Arizona State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 31-35 | — | 6 | 130 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs TCU | L 27-38 | — | 2 | 16 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ West Virginia | L 28-32 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Illinois | L 17-23 | — | 3 | 42 | 8.8 | 14 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 25 | 26 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas
2020-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
2020202120222022202320232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Kansas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Kansas | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Kansas | 440 | 66.2 | 12.4 | 440 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Kansas | 440 | 66.2 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Kansas | 587 | 92.1 | 16.7 | 147 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Kansas | 587 | 92.1 | 16.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Kansas | 557 | 91.1 | 19 | -30 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135
Primary metric
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona State
130
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
98
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
TCU
98
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa State
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Kansas
587 primary output · 92.1 efficiency · 16.7 usage
68.8
#2
2023 Regular Season · Kansas
68.8
587 primary · 92.1 efficiency · 16.7 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Kansas
65.5
557 primary · 91.1 efficiency · 19 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.78
Claremore · Claremore, OK
- Committed To
- Kansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,584
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.