Usage Score
13
Player Dossier
2021-2025Duke
Sahmir Hagans
WR • 5'10" • 190 lbs • Philadelphia, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Sahmir Hagans reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.8
Consistency
66.8
Season Value
63.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Duke
212222232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Duke
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sahmir Hagans, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Duke. Sahmir Hagans reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Duke paired 512 primary output with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Duke
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
36.6
Efficiency
73.8
Usage
13
Consistency
66.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 45. Unknown: 54. Illinois: 33. Tulane: 29. NC State: 63. Syracuse: 59. California: 10. Georgia Tech: 69. Clemson: 2. UConn: 23. Virginia: 35. North Carolina: 30. Wake Forest: 29. Virginia: 31
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 6 by 50. Unknown: 5 by 72. Illinois: 3 by 73.3. Tulane: 1 by 100. NC State: 3 by 100. Syracuse: 5 by 78.7. California: 3 by 22.2. Georgia Tech: 5 by 92. Clemson: 3 by 4.4. UConn: 2 by 76.7. Virginia: 1 by 100. North Carolina: 3 by 66.7. Wake Forest: 2 by 96.7. Virginia: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins33.6 · n=8 · -4.2 vs Losses
Losses37.8 · n=5 · +4.2 vs Wins
First Half41.9 · n=7 · +10.6 vs Second Half
Second Half31.3 · n=7 · -10.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Arizona State | W 42-39 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 12/7 | @ Virginia | W 27-20 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Wake Forest | W 49-32 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ North Carolina | W 32-25 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Virginia | L 17-34 | — | 1 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ UConn | L 34-37 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Clemson | W 46-45 | — | 3 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.70 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Georgia Tech | L 18-27 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 10/5 | @ California | W 45-21 | — | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Syracuse | W 38-3 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs NC State | W 45-33 | — | 3 | 63 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Tulane | L 27-34 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Illinois | L 19-45 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 24 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 2 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2021-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202120222022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Duke | 5 | 33.3 | 4.8 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Duke | 400 | 70.3 | 14.9 | 395 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Duke | 400 | 70.3 | 14.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Duke | 260 | 53 | 20 | -140 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Duke | 260 | 53 | 20 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Duke | 413 | 46.6 | 17.5 | 153 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Duke | 413 | 46.6 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Duke | 512 | 73.8 | 13 | 99 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Duke | 512 | 73.8 | 13 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
139
Primary metric
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wake Forest
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia Tech
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
#4
NC State
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Troy
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Duke
512 primary output · 73.8 efficiency · 13 usage
63.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Duke
63.4
512 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 13 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Duke
52.9
400 primary · 70.3 efficiency · 14.9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.845
Westerville South · Westerville, OH
- Committed To
- Miami (OH)
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,590
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 52 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.