Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 1,210 primary output with 63.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2022 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 13 | 128 | 128 | 0 | 0 | 80.6 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 13 | 1,082 | 931 | 151 | 8 | 80.6 |
| 2024 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 13 | 168 | 136 | 32 | 1 | 70.9 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 13 | 930 | 808 | 122 | 11 | 70.9 |
| 2025 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 13 | 41 | 27 | 14 | 0 | 57.8 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 13 | 747 | 504 | 243 | 5 | 57.8 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 1,210 primary output with 63.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 44 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with 146 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
60.6
Efficiency
44
Usage
21.6
Consistency
60.2
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 41. Colorado: 92. Gardner-Webb: 100. Clemson: 62. Temple: 146. Wake Forest: 35. Virginia Tech: 81. Duke: 29. Syracuse: 51. NC State: 36. Boston College: 22. Pittsburgh: 68. Georgia: 25
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 10 by 38.2. Colorado: 17 by 47.9. Gardner-Webb: 10 by 91.7. Clemson: 16 by 29.7. Temple: 16 by 88. Wake Forest: 15 by 22.8. Virginia Tech: 15 by 53.3. Duke: 8 by 37.8. Syracuse: 9 by 44.1. NC State: 9 by 31.3. Boston College: 7 by 23.1. Pittsburgh: 16 by 42.1. Georgia: 9 by 21.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.