Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
East Carolina paired 14.5 primary output with 23 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2021 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1 | 2 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 40.3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | East Carolina | 1 | 2 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 40 |
| 2023 Regular Season | East Carolina | 2 | 2 | - | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 23.3 |
| 2024 Regular Season | East Carolina | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 16.2 |
| 2025 Postseason | East Carolina | 11 | 5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | - | - | 0 | 55.9 |
| 2025 Regular Season | East Carolina | 11 | 21 | 5 | 3.5 | 3 | - | 0 | 55.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
East Carolina paired 14.5 primary output with 23 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 23 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, East Carolina.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
23
Usage
6.5
Consistency
46.1
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 3. Campbell: 2. Coastal Carolina: 3. BYU: 1. Army: 0. Tulane: 0. Tulsa: 2. Temple: 2. Charlotte: 0.5. Memphis: 1. Florida Atlantic: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 5 by 50.8. Campbell: 2 by 28.3. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 38.3. BYU: 3 by 22.5. Army: 3 by 12.5. Tulane: 3 by 12.5. Tulsa: 4 by 36.7. Temple: 2 by 28.3. Charlotte: 1 by 9.2. Memphis: 0 by 10. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.