Player Stats

Anthony Hawkins College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
154
TFL
22
Sacks
10
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonBowling Green51210-1015.9
2021 Regular SeasonBowling Green1033421-028.2
2022 Regular SeasonBowling Green103251-1035.8
2023 PostseasonBowling Green13310--034.7
2023 Regular SeasonBowling Green13283.5222034.7
2024 PostseasonBowling Green133-0--059
2024 Regular SeasonBowling Green13437.5523059

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Bowling Green paired 17.5 primary output with 28.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Fordham

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Bowling Green

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

28.2

Usage

7.9

Consistency

41.9

Best Game by takeover score

Fordham

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 0. Fordham: 4.5. Penn State: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Old Dominion: 2. Akron: 0. Northern Illinois: 1. Kent State: 2.5. Toledo: 1. Central Michigan: 2. Western Michigan: 2. Ball State: 2. Miami (OH): 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 3 by 12.5. Fordham: 7 by 74.2. Penn State: 2 by 8.3. Texas A&M: 7 by 29.2. Old Dominion: 7 by 49.2. Akron: 2 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 5 by 30.8. Kent State: 2 by 33.3. Toledo: 3 by 22.5. Central Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Western Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Ball State: 0 by 20. Miami (OH): 2 by 13.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2 · Games = 7 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 6 · -1.4 vs Wins