Player Stats

Malik Rutherford College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,014
Receptions
182
Touchdowns
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech1562065.2
2022 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech1023225042
2023 PostseasonGeorgia Tech13240165.7
2023 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech1344462365.7
2024 PostseasonGeorgia Tech13332076.1
2024 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech1359670376.1
2025 PostseasonGeorgia Tech118105064.3
2025 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech1138418364.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Georgia Tech paired 702 primary output with 68.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 63.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: BYU

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Georgia Tech

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

47.5

Efficiency

63.3

Usage

21.1

Consistency

48.9

Best Game by takeover score

BYU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. BYU: 105. Colorado: 0. Gardner-Webb: 62. Clemson: 22. Temple: 33. Wake Forest: 38. Virginia Tech: 49. Duke: -2. Boston College: 121. Pittsburgh: 68. Georgia: 27

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 8 by 87.5. Gardner-Webb: 5 by 82.7. Clemson: 4 by 36.7. Temple: 2 by 100. Wake Forest: 5 by 50.7. Virginia Tech: 6 by 54.4. Duke: 1 by 0. Boston College: 5 by 100. Pittsburgh: 6 by 75.6. Georgia: 4 by 45

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins40.4 · Games = 8 · -26.3 vs Losses
Losses66.7 · Games = 3 · +26.3 vs Wins