Player Stats

Jardin Gilbert College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
141
TFL
4
Sacks
1.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonTexas A&M5130.50.5-1020.1
2022 Regular SeasonTexas A&M106010-4047.5
2023 Regular SeasonTexas A&M250.50-1028
2024 PostseasonLSU12710--038
2024 Regular SeasonLSU12450.50.5-2038
2025 PostseasonLSU37-0--028.5
2025 Regular SeasonLSU340.50.51-028.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Texas A&M paired 7 primary output with 32 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 22 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, LSU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · LSU

Games

3

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

22

Usage

6.3

Consistency

11.1

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Houston: 0. Clemson: 0. Louisiana Tech: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 7 by 29.2. Clemson: 3 by 12.5. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 24.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 2 · +1 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -1 vs Wins