Usage Score
20.1
Player Dossier
2021-2024Georgia Southern
Derwin Burgess Jr.
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Riverdale, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Derwin Burgess Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.4
Consistency
69.6
Season Value
62.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
212223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Georgia Southern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Derwin Burgess Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Georgia Southern. Derwin Burgess Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Georgia Southern paired 717 primary output with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Coastal Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Georgia Southern
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
50.7
Efficiency
70.4
Usage
20.1
Consistency
69.6
Best Game by takeover score
Sam Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Sam Houston: 56. Boise State: 93. Nevada: 52. Unknown: 27. Ole Miss: 53. Georgia State: 20. Marshall: 84. James Madison: 52. Old Dominion: 59. South Alabama: 21. Troy: 25. Coastal Carolina: 98. App State: 19
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Sam Houston: 6 by 62.2. Boise State: 4 by 100. Nevada: 5 by 69.3. Unknown: 1 by 100. Ole Miss: 5 by 70.7. Georgia State: 4 by 33.3. Marshall: 7 by 80. James Madison: 5 by 69.3. Old Dominion: 4 by 98.3. South Alabama: 4 by 35. Troy: 2 by 83.3. Coastal Carolina: 8 by 81.7. App State: 4 by 31.7
Split Comparison
Wins49.4 · n=7 · -7.8 vs Losses
Losses57.2 · n=5 · +7.8 vs Wins
First Half55 · n=7 · +9.3 vs Second Half
Second Half45.7 · n=6 · -9.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Coastal Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/20 | @ Sam Houston | L 26-31 | — | 6 | 56 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs App State | W 29-20 | — | 4 | 19 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Coastal CarolinaHigh volume | W 26-6 | — | 8 | 98 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Troy | L 20-28 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ South Alabama | W 34-30 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 10/24 | @ Old Dominion | L 19-47 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs James Madison | W 28-14 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 10/13 | vs Marshall | W 24-23 | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Georgia State | W 38-21 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Ole Miss | L 13-52 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Nevada | W 20-17 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Boise State | L 45-56 | — | 4 | 93 | 19 | 23.30 | 0 | 48 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Southern
2021-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
202120222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 311 | 70.5 | 20.9 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 717 | 75.5 | 19.6 | 406 |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 813 | 68.2 | 19.7 | 96 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 813 | 68.2 | 19.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 659 | 70.4 | 20.1 | -154 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 659 | 70.4 | 20.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134
Primary metric
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wisconsin
124
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Coastal Carolina
98
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
717 primary output · 75.5 efficiency · 19.6 usage
65.5
#2
2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern
65
813 primary · 68.2 efficiency · 19.7 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
65
813 primary · 68.2 efficiency · 19.7 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8456
Greene County · Eutaw, AL
- Committed To
- Troy
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,500
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.