Usage Score
19.8
Player Dossier
2021-2024Syracuse
WR • 6'2" • 210 lbs • Phenix City, AL, USA
Jackson Meeks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.8
Efficiency
80.8
Consistency
62.6
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Syracuse
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jackson Meeks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Syracuse. Jackson Meeks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jackson Meeks played WR for Georgia and Syracuse. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jackson Meeks recorded 1,153 receiving yards, 6 tackles, and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Syracuse.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Syracuse paired 1,021 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia, Syracuse.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
78.5
Efficiency
80.8
Usage
19.8
Consistency
62.6
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 110. Ohio: 43. Georgia Tech: 32. Stanford: 40. Unknown: 161. UNLV: 67. NC State: 116. Pittsburgh: 53. Virginia Tech: 36. Boston College: 105. California: 38. UConn: 110. Miami: 110
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 5 by 100. Ohio: 2 by 100. Georgia Tech: 4 by 53.3. Stanford: 3 by 88.9. Unknown: 10 by 100. UNLV: 8 by 55.8. NC State: 11 by 70.3. Pittsburgh: 5 by 70.7. Virginia Tech: 5 by 48. Boston College: 7 by 100. California: 4 by 63.3. UConn: 7 by 100. Miami: 7 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Washington State100 receiving yards | W 52-35 | — | 5 | 110 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Miami100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 42-38 | — | 7 | 110 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 2 | 33 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs UConn100 receiving yards | W 31-24 | — | 7 | 110 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ California | W 33-25 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Boston College100 receiving yards | L 31-37 | — | 7 | 105 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Virginia Tech | W 38-31 | — | 5 | 36 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 10/24 | @ Pittsburgh | L 13-41 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/13 | @ NC State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-17 | — | 11 | 116 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ UNLVHigh volume | W 44-41 | — | 8 | 67 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 10 | 161 | 16.1 | 16.10 | 1 | 38 |
| Fri 9/20 | vs Stanford | L 24-26 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Georgia Tech | W 31-28 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Ohio | W 38-22 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 0 | 35 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Georgia
2021-2023
Opening stop
Syracuse
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia | 44 | 71.1 | 8 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Georgia | 65 | 70.7 | 7 | 21 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia | 23 | 100 | 4 | -42 |
| 2024 Postseason | Syracuse | 1,021 | 80.8 | 19.8 | 998 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Syracuse | 1,021 | 80.8 | 19.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
161
Primary metric
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
27
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tennessee
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Washington State
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Syracuse
1,021 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 19.8 usage
65.8
#2
2024 Regular Season · Syracuse
65.8
1,021 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 19.8 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Georgia
51.6
23 primary · 100 efficiency · 4 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8567
Terrebonne · Houma, LA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,153
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.